CZ stated in a post on X platform, "What if someone issues a token with the following tokenomics? Initially, 10% of the tokens are unlocked and sold on the market. The proceeds will be used for project team building products/platforms, marketing, salaries, etc. Each future unlock must meet all of the following conditions:

Six months after the last unlock.

Only when the token price has remained above twice the last unlock price for more than 30 consecutive days before unlocking.

A maximum of 5% of tokens can be unlocked each time.

For example, if the Token Generation Event (TGE) was in January, with a price of $1, then by June, if the token price is still below $2, no more tokens can be unlocked. Assuming the token price has been above $2 from July 4th to August 3rd, then on August 3rd, 5% of the tokens can be unlocked for circulation. Assuming the price on August 3rd is $3. The earliest possible unlock date is March 3rd next year, and only if the price is above $6 for more than 30 days can the tokens be unlocked.

The project team has the right to delay or reduce the size of each unlock. If they do not want to sell more tokens, they do not have to. But they can sell (unlock) a maximum of 5% each time, then they must wait at least 6 months and the price must double again.

The project team does not have the right to shorten or increase the size of the next unlock. Tokens should be locked by smart contracts, controlled by a third party key. This prevents new tokens from flooding the market when prices are low. It also incentivizes the project team for long-term development. I have no plans to issue new tokens. Just an idea for discussion."